Outrageous Optics: Why CEOs Must Learn Interview 'Bridging' Skills
The Dejargonizer’s Foot in Mouth of The Month Award goes to Substack CEO Chris Best 👏👏 🦶😬
///boilerplate///Welcome to The Dejargonizer, the newsletter from communications advisor and former WSJ EMEA tech editor Amir Mizroch. You can read more about the newsletter here. There’s also a new podcast.///
[[[New Edition]]]
Substack CEO
was far from his best on a recent high-profile interview with The Verge editor in chief .Substack recently released a new feature called Notes, which feels a lot like Twitter. Mr. Best went on to Patel’s show to promote the new feature and discuss how it’s different and better. Patel asks Best about content moderation on Notes.
If you haven’t watched this yet, you really should.
Now there’s a whole genre of CEO interviews done gone wrong; and the raw WTAF-ness of this one belongs in the pantheon.
Here’s a pro tip: Besides turning up on time, not lying, and not being an asshole, the big secret ingredient to a successful media interview is to master the skill of “bridging”.
Bridging is going from fielding difficult questions by acknowledging them, moving to more stable ground by addressing them, and if done authentically, taking that opening to land your messaging and move the conversation along.
With good “bridging”, this part of the interview could have gone something like this:
Nilay Patel: “Is it acceptable to post that all brown people are animals and shouldn’t be allowed in the US on your platform?”
Chris Best: “Of course not. We do not condone bigotry in any form.”
[[Acknowledge the question as something Nilay deeply cares about]]
Once you feel the interviewer has heard you proving that you’ve heard them, you have established a bridge. Congratulations!
Now take a step, start laying down more tracks.
“Having said that, we do have a strong commitment to freedom of speech on our platform.
Did that land ok? Take another step.
“As you know Nilay, the line between freedom of speech and incitement to hate speech is now and has always been contentious —although the example you mentioned is clearly unacceptable and it targets a specific group of people.”
Then another step.
“We fully expect to have to adapt our content moderation policies and approach as the platform evolves.”
That most likely would have been that. In fact it’s what Substack put out after the interview.
By continuously avoiding giving a clear condemnation of Patel’s example, by visibly retreating to formulaic legalese, Best just invites Patel go after him harder.
For the CEO of a popular publishing platform that aims to “build a new economic engine for culture” —
did himself no favors.Mr. Best could have taken a page out of Elon Musk’s interview with the BBC.
///LinkedIn Ads Nauseam///
So that's what a Statamic for PHP looks like!
///LinkedIn ShlinkedIn///
If you haven’t come across LinkedIn parody site ShlinkedIn yet, go check it out.
///WTEKS, Amazon?///
///Tunnel Thinking is 2022. Funnel Thinking is so NOW///
///From the people who brought you Funnel Thinking: Introducing the Hero’s Journey Framework!!///
///this is how it all ends///